Skip to content

Behind the Numbers: Seven Years of Delaware’s Grant-in-Aid Funding 


Delaware’s Grant-in-Aid program is a critical source of state support for nonprofit organizations, senior centers, first responders, veterans’ organizations, and other community-serving institutions. Between fiscal years 2021 and 2027, the total GIA budget has increased from approximately $54.3 million to $99.4 million, an increase of 83.4%. 

That growth is substantial, but it also reflects reclassifications, shifts from other parts of the state budget, and changing one-time investments, not simply new funding. 

Below is a deep dive into the numbers and historical trends of Delaware’s Grant-in-Aid to provide you with an analysis of this vital funding source for nonprofits. 

Modest Overall Growth in Fiscal 2027 

The fiscal 2027 GIA bill totals approximately $99.4 million, an increase of about $1.1 million, or 1.14%, over fiscal 2026. 

The GIA budget grew by approximately 83% between fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2027. Through fiscal 2026, however, inflation-adjusted growth was closer to 47%. Complete fiscal 2027 inflation data are not yet available. 

Although this year’s overall increase was modest, the bill’s major sections moved in different directions: 

  • Government units and senior centers increased by 9.3%.  
  • Fire companies and public-service ambulance companies increased by 17.2%.  
  • Veterans’ organizations increased by 17.4%.  
  • One-times and community agencies decreased by 10.1%. 

The decrease in the community-agency section does not mean that recurring nonprofit support declined overall. Instead, much of the reduction resulted from a significant decrease in one-time appropriations. 

How the Fiscal 2027 Bill Is Distributed 

In fiscal 2027, senior centers, community agencies, and nonprofit one-times received 46.9% of the GIA funding, followed by first responders at 41%. Government units and nonprofit one-times not directed to nonprofits are at 11.1%, and veterans’ organizations at 1%. 

The nonprofit and senior center share remained nearly unchanged from fiscal 2026, when it also represented approximately 46.9% of the bill. First responders’ share increased from 38.4% to 41%, while the government-unit and government one-time share declined from 13.8% to 11.1%. 

Over the longer term, the share devoted to nonprofits and senior centers has fluctuated considerably. It exceeded 51% in fiscal 2021, fell to 42.5% in fiscal 2025, and returned to approximately 47% in fiscal 2026 and this year. These changes demonstrate that growth in the total GIA bill does not necessarily translate into proportional growth for every recipient group. 

Recurring Funding Grew as One-Times Fell 

The total for one-times and community agencies fell from approximately $47.1 million in fiscal 2026 to $42.3 million this year, but the decline was driven primarily by lower one-time appropriations rather than reductions to recurring community-agency funding. 

After removing one-times, recurring funding across the community-agency categories increased from $33.2 million to $34.7 million, an increase of roughly 4.5%. 

All five recurring subcategories received increases: 

  1. Arts, Historical, or Recreation increased by 16.9%. 
  1. Economic, Housing, or Labor Services increased by 14.8%. 
  1. Health or Disability Services increased by approximately 10.0%. 
  1. Family and Youth Services increased by approximately 9.0%. 
  1. Neighborhood and Community Services increased by 8.4%. 

At the same time, total one-time funding fell from $13.9 million to $7.6 million, a reduction of about 45%. The decline was especially significant for nonprofit one-times, which decreased from approximately $940,000 in fiscal 2026 to $255,000 this year, a reduction of nearly 73%. 

One-time funding can support urgent needs, pilot programs, capital projects, or temporary priorities, but its variability makes it difficult for organizations to rely on it for ongoing services. This year’s Grant-in-Aid therefore shows a notable contrast. Recurring community-agency support increased, while one-time funding declined sharply. 

Funding Eliminations and Internal Shifts 

Recurring community-agency funding increased overall, but the gains were not universal. Fifteen organizations that received recurring GIA funding in fiscal 2026 received no funding anywhere in the fiscal 2027 bill, eliminating approximately $244,000 in prior-year appropriations. 

Other apparent reductions reflected movement within the bill rather than complete funding losses. Several appropriations shifted between nonprofit subcategories, some one-time funding became recurring support, and senior-center transportation moved from the Aging category into Section 1. 

These changes make it important to track organizations and programs across the full bill and distinguish actual funding cuts from reclassifications. 

Senior Centers and Transportation 

Direct senior center appropriations increased from approximately $9.57 million in fiscal 2026 to $9.92 million in fiscal 2027, an increase of about 3.6%. 

This year’s Grant-in-Aid also changed how senior center transportation funding is presented. A statewide transportation line previously included within the Aging category was moved into Section 1 and distributed among senior centers in Kent and Sussex counties. The transportation appropriation increased from $1.68 million to $1.76 million. 

For year-to-year analysis, it is important to account for this structural change. Looking only at the Aging subtotal would make it appear that the category experienced a substantial reduction, even though the transportation funding remained in the bill and increased after being relocated. 

Regional differences are also visible in the direct senior center appropriations. Excluding transportation, fiscal 2027 provided approximately: 

  • $3.96 million to 13 centers in New Castle County outside Wilmington, averaging about $304,600 per center.  
  • $2.79 million to 13 centers in Sussex County, averaging about $214,600 per center.  
  • $1.80 million to seven centers in Kent County, averaging about $257,100 per center.  
  • $1.37 million to eight centers in Wilmington, averaging about $171,300 per center.  

These averages show regional variation but do not establish whether funding is equitable. A fuller assessment would need to account for center size, service volume, transportation responsibilities, and community need. 

Continued Growth for Veterans’ Organizations 

Veterans’ organizations received approximately $985,000 in fiscal 2027, an increase of about 17.4% from last year. 

While veterans’ funding still represents only about 1% of the overall GIA bill, it has grown steadily in recent years. Funding increased from approximately $354,000 in fiscal 2021 to nearly $1 million in fiscal 2027. 

This is one example of how a relatively small portion of the overall bill can experience significant targeted growth even when the total GIA appropriation changes only modestly. 

The Bottom Line 

The fiscal 2027 GIA bill grew modestly overall, but the changes within it were more significant than the topline increase suggests. 

Recurring community agency funding rose across every major nonprofit subcategory, while direct support for senior centers, first responders, and veterans’ organizations also increased. At the same time, nonprofit one-time funding fell sharply; 15 organizations lost funding entirely, and several appropriations were moved between categories or sections. 

These shifts reinforce that the total size of the GIA bill tells only part of the story. A meaningful year-to-year analysis must separate recurring from one-time funding, track organizations across the full bill, and distinguish actual cuts from reclassifications. 

As Delaware continues to refine the Grant-in-Aid process, transparent criteria, consistent categorization, and accessible year-to-year data will be essential to understanding whether funding decisions reflect community needs and support the long-term stability of essential services.